Here are seven takeaways from SIWI staff who attended different sessions. You can also find interesting background material in the World Water Week At Home programme.
1) Safety is the new top concern.
For the past decades, most global actors have focused on efficiency, with increasingly complex supply-chains crisscrossing the world. But this has also made societies more vulnerable in times of crisis, which Covid-19 has made painfully apparent. To prepare for a much more uncertain and dangerous future, with emerging risks linked to global warming and degraded ecosystems, the new top priority must be safety and resilience.
The next crisis will most likely also be related to water – almost all disasters are – so this creates new expectations on the water community. Awareness of this is rapidly growing, though not fast enough.
The most recent international climate summit, COP25 in Madrid, saw many more countries interested in water-related solutions. During World Water Week At Home, several sessions discussed the preparations ahead of next year’s COP26 and what can make countries work more actively with water in their nationally determined contributions to the Paris agreement. Participants called for a more holistic approach, with increased focus on the role of resilient landscapes and societies.
2) Resilience requires collaboration.
One of the most fascinating aspects of At World Water Week At Home was how people who otherwise don’t meet now got a chance to explore areas where their work intersect. Several sessions for example discussed housing from a variety of perspectives. With an expected addition of two or three billion people to the planet, how their future homes are constructed is an enormous environmental challenge. There is a need for “greener” and less water-consuming building materials, but also for more effective wastewater treatment. And for more solutions that are off-grid, viable even with more waste taken care of directly in the buildings. A new prerequisite is also that houses must be able to withstand the more extreme weather and rising sea levels that will follow from global warming.
This way of looking at housing makes obvious sense from many perspectives. It would save lives and cut costs since extreme weather events would as a result be less harmful to people and buildings, and fewer people would succumb to diseases caused by dirty water. It is also fundamental to protecting the ocean and landscapes from growing flows of pollution.
3) Silos are increasingly dangerous.
What then prevents this necessary collaboration for resilience? Many sessions discussed the risks associated with outdated silos thinking, where no one sees the whole picture, no one is responsible, where it is impossible to pool budgets and decision-making is too fragmented. Growing polarization within countries and a more toxic rhetoric between countries can make collaboration even more difficult, especially in transboundary basins.
The problem is however increasingly acknowledged in discussions on how to implement the Paris agreement on climate change and the 2030 Agenda. If recovery measures after the current pandemic are structured to encourage problem solving beyond boundaries, that could have a great impact. There are models to follow, for example the source-to-sea approach which was highlighted by the Swedish Minister for Environment and Climate Isabella Lövin.