The risk is that, in their haste to reverse the worst global economic downturn since the Second World War, governments will turn to quick fixes that will accelerate environmental destruction just when the world can least afford it. That is why it is critical to act now—before major expenditures are channelled into the stimulation of sectors that will bring more carbon emissions, more land use change, more soil erosion, and more deforestation.
Failure to factor the environment into decision-making risks worsening three of what the World Economic Forum ranks as the top five threats to the global economy: climate action failure; biodiversity loss; and extreme weather. Yet today, government support for sectors that harm the environment dwarfs spending on efforts to fix that damage.
“Once governments accept that they must redirect capital toward sustainable activity, they will find there are a host of possible initiatives that deliver economic as well as ecological benefits.”
According to the Paulson Institute, the Nature Conservancy, and Cornell University, annual global spending on biodiversity conservation is between $124 billion and $143 billion—a fraction of what is required, with an annual shortfall of $598 billion to $824 billion.
This may sound like a wide gulf to bridge, but it is possible. Roughly half could be closed without new investment, the report said, by cutting subsidies to ecologically damaging sectors. Governments now spend almost $542 billion each year on agricultural, fisheries, and forestry subsidies alone. Energy and mining receive billions more.